African water privatizationNew report on African water privatization A new report worth checking out: Water privatisation in SSA: Progress, problems and policy implications by Kate Bayliss, PSIRU (a UK based think tank that looks at issues affecting public sector services, among other things). Available at: www.psiru.org Privatisation has been carried out to some degree in fourteen countries in SSA, and many others are interested. A handful of major multinationals are buying up all these utilities. Here is the intro... 1 Introduction: water in SSA is not like other commodities Water privatisation is increasingly widespread and in sub-Saharan Africa, privatisation is now on the agenda in most countries. This paper aims to analyse developments in water privatisation in SSA by looking firstly at what privatisation has taken place in the region. The subsequent section then considers the countries where privatisation has not taken place and the reasons for this. There is then a review of findings from case studies on the impact of privatisation. Finally we consider the lessons to be learned and policy implications from the experience of privatisation in SSA. Water in SSA is not like other commodities. Consumers in SSA are among the poorest in the world. Furthermore, the currencies of these often fragile economies are vulnerable to fluctuation and devaluation. These features present particular difficulties in promoting the water sector as an attractive business prospect. In much of SSA, the institutional structure of the public sector is weak. This, for some, presents a reason to privatise. However, the consequent weak regulatory capacity could also be a reason for retaining water in the public sector. In much of the region, the water sector, starved of investment from cash-strapped governments, is generally in a bad state of disrepair. Water privatisation is largely donor sponsored which means that the release of aid funds is often conditional on the privatisation of water (Grusky 2001). Water privatisation in SSA has always required a foreign investor but so far only a handful of companies have taken part in privatization tenders. The international dimension of privatization requires extra vigilance in regulation to monitor transactions between the domestic operation and the parent MNC. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||